Skip to main content
· 3/29/2005

D'Ambrosio v. D'Ambrosio

Citations

  • 610 S.E.2d 876
  • 45 Va. App. 323
  • 2005 Va. App. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an order prohibiting husband from making any “defamatory comments” about his ex-wife to any “third parties” was too vague and overly broad for the husband to know what statements might subject him to contempt
  • even though parent did not specifically request sole authority to select child’s physician, trial court had authority to grant that relief where mother included general prayer for relief and the remedy was in child’s best interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Humphreys

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.