Skip to main content
· 7/16/2015

Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.

Citations

  • 793 F.3d 1059
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12290
  • 127 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1231
  • 2015 WL 4282986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A plaintiff may not simply rest on the 26 bare allegations of the complaint.”
  • “The paradigmatic locations where 13 general jurisdiction is appropriate over a corporation are its place of incorporation and its principal 14 place of business. Only in an ‘exceptional case’ will general jurisdiction be available anywhere 15 else.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Paez, Ikuta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.