Skip to main content
S.D. Texas· 2/21/2014

Daily Instruments Corp v. Heidt

Citations

  • 998 F. Supp. 2d 553
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21766
  • 2014 WL 710683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Texas law and concluding that restriction limited to narrow field of reactor thermometry products—and not refining, petrochemical, and chemical industries as a whole—was reasonable
  • “Covenants with wide geographic areas have been upheld in Texas courts, especially when the area covered constitutes the employees[’] actual sales or work territory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Werlein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.