Guy Carpenter & Company, Inc. v. Anthony Provenzale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a customer list was readily ascertainable when evidence indicated that “participants in the reinsurance market freely disclose the identity of their reinsurance broker and the nature of the reinsurance products they regularly consume”
• concluding equitable extensions of noncompetition periods allowed under Texas law
• applying Texas law and stating that non-solicitation covenants restrain trade and competition and are governed by the Act
• applying Texas law and stating that non-solicitation covenants restrain trade and competition and are governed by the Act
• “[R]emand[ing] for the district court to apply the other three factors governing preliminary injunctions” after it erred in its analysis of the likelihood of success on the merits
• remanding so district court could consider additional preliminary injunction factors not decided below

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).