Skip to main content
· 12/23/1996

Polymer Technologies, Inc., and Walter Polovina v. Andrew P. Bridwell, H.A. Spec. Co., and Westmark Ag Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 103 F.3d 970
  • 41 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1185
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33384
  • 1996 WL 736596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[N]one [of the factors] may be ignored before granting a preliminary injunction” (internal quotation omitted) (emphasis in original)
  • loss of market opportunities cannot be quantified or adequately compensated, and is evidence of irreparable harm
  • loss of market opportunities cannot be quantified or adequately compensated and is evidence of irreparable harm
  • loss of market opportunities cannot be quantified or adequately compensated, and is evidence of irreparable harm
  • “Years after infringement has begun, it may be impossible to restore a patentee’s . . . exclusive position by an award of damages and a permanent injunction. Customers may have estab- lished relationships with infringers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clevenger, Lourie, Mayer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.