· 12/23/1996
Polymer Technologies, Inc., and Walter Polovina v. Andrew P. Bridwell, H.A. Spec. Co., and Westmark Ag Group, Inc.
Citations
- 103 F.3d 970
- 41 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1185
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33384
- 1996 WL 736596
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[N]one [of the factors] may be ignored before granting a preliminary injunction” (internal quotation omitted) (emphasis in original)
- loss of market opportunities cannot be quantified or adequately compensated, and is evidence of irreparable harm
- loss of market opportunities cannot be quantified or adequately compensated and is evidence of irreparable harm
- loss of market opportunities cannot be quantified or adequately compensated, and is evidence of irreparable harm
- “Years after infringement has begun, it may be impossible to restore a patentee’s . . . exclusive position by an award of damages and a permanent injunction. Customers may have estab- lished relationships with infringers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clevenger, Lourie, Mayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.