D. Colorado· 12/10/1990
Daigle v. Shell Oil Co.
Citations
- 133 F.R.D. 600
- 1990 WL 209217
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding numerosity prong was not met because joinder was not impracticable where only 78 individuals expressed interest in joining the lawsuit and all 78 were already named as plaintiffs
- “To satisfy the commonality and typicality requirements, either common questions of law or fact ... will be deemed sufficient.”
- ability to modify suggests that a court err in favor of certification
- 78 class members, each with substantial claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carrigan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- O'Connor v. Boeing North American, Inc.C.D. California· 1998-07-13· cited 106×
- Vaszlavik v. Storage Technology Corp.D. Colorado· 1997-11-26· cited 91×
- Liberty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.D. New Jersey· 1993-05-14· cited 85×
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.D. Colorado· 1993-10-08· cited 71×
- Alharbi v. MillerE.D. New York· 2019-03-26· cited 59×
- O'Neil v. AppelW.D. Michigan· 1996-02-29· cited 49×
- Yslava v. Hughes Aircraft Co.D. Arizona· 1993-11-17· cited 44×
- Meyer Ex Rel. Coplin v. Fluor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri· 2007-03-20· cited 31×
- Maez v. Springs Automotive Group, LLCD. Colorado· 2010-06-21· cited 29×
- Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition v. Taco Bell Corp.D. Colorado· 1999-02-03· cited 28×
- Dale v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-06-30· cited 26×
- Hum v. DericksD. Hawaii· 1995-08-01· cited 24×
- Talbott v. GC Services Ltd. PartnershipW.D. Virginia· 2000-02-09· cited 23×
- In re TJX Companies Retail Security Breach LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2007-11-29· cited 19×
- Sandlin v. Shapiro & FishmanM.D. Florida· 1996-09-30· cited 19×
- Reilly v. Gould, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-05-28· cited 17×
- Pueblo of Zuni v. United StatesD. New Mexico· 2007-05-22· cited 17×
- Reeb v. Ohio Department of RehabilitationS.D. Ohio· 2001-10-25· cited 14×
- Burkhead v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.W.D. Kentucky· 2008-03-21· cited 14×
- Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceD. Colorado· 2007-09-18· cited 11×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationSixth Circuit· 1988-10-20· cited 445×
- Esplin v. HirschiTenth Circuit· 1968-09-30· cited 393×
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 325×
- Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationSeventh Circuit· 1981-10-07· cited 307×
- William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1964-03-26· cited 282×
- Hector GARCIA, Etc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alton v. W. GLOOR Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesFifth Circuit· 1980-05-22· cited 217×
- Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. KleindienstD.C. Circuit· 1984-08-17· cited 159×
- Alliance to End Repression v. James M. Rochford, Etc., American Civil Liberties Union v. Griffin B. BellSeventh Circuit· 1977-11-22· cited 155×
- Albertson's, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. The Amalgamated Sugar Company, a Utah Corporation, and Utah-Idaho Sugar Company, a Utah CorporationTenth Circuit· 1974-10-02· cited 53×
- Rex v. OwensTenth Circuit· 1978-10-04· cited 40×
- Walsh v. Ford Motor Co.District of Columbia· 1985-05-09· cited 21×
- McHan v. GrandboucheD. Kansas· 1983-03-29· cited 18×
- Rodriguez v. Bar-S Food Co.D. Colorado· 1983-07-11· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.