Skip to main content
D. Colorado· 11/26/1997

Vaszlavik v. Storage Technology Corp.

Citations

  • 175 F.R.D. 672
  • 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2398
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19355
  • 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1189
  • 1997 WL 749519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that conditional certification for notice purposes was warranted based on plaintiffs’ allegations that they were victims of a plan by defendant to eliminate older workers through reductions-in-force
  • permitting collective action for liability phase in case where the plaintiffs allege a pattern or practice of discrimination
  • rejecting request to skip notice stage inquiry “because discovery is not complete and significant economies can still be achieved by collective discovery and trial preparation”
  • rejecting overbroad definition, stating “it is not for me to revise the proposed class definition for plaintiffs”
  • rejecting overbroad definition, stating “it is not for me to revise the proposed class definition for plaintiffs”
  • proposing to revisit the issue of a collective action during the remedial phase

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Babcock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Vaszlavik v. Storage Technology Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.