D. Kansas· 3/29/1983
McHan v. Grandbouche
Citations
- 99 F.R.D. 260
- 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1227
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]he primary personal issue present in a case of common law fraud which precludes the use of the class action device is the necessity of proof of reliance by each member of the purported class”
- “the fact that we are dealing primarily with oral representations made at different times by the defendants raises issues which are personal to each separate plaintiff and are, therefore, uncommon to the class as a whole”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.D. Kansas· 1989-02-23· cited 55×
- Zapata v. IBP, Inc.D. Kansas· 1996-05-15· cited 49×
- Seiler v. E.F. Hutton & Co.D. New Jersey· 1984-08-15· cited 47×
- Shields v. KeatingD. Arizona· 1992-01-07· cited 44×
- Daigle v. Shell Oil Co.D. Colorado· 1990-12-10· cited 36×
- Graham v. Security Savings & LoanN.D. Indiana· 1989-03-07· cited 32×
- Murray v. SevierD. Kansas· 1994-06-08· cited 32×
- Rushing v. Alon USA, Inc.D. Kansas· 2013-04-05· cited 27×
- Glick v. E.F. Hutton & Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-06-14· cited 26×
- Spencer v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundN.D. Illinois· 1991-12-05· cited 24×
- Nicodemus v. Union Pacific Corp.D. Wyoming· 2001-12-06· cited 22×
- In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationD. Kansas· 2012-01-19· cited 19×
- Commander Properties Corp. v. Beech Aircraft Corp.D. Kansas· 1995-12-05· cited 17×
- Juvera v. SalcidoD. Arizona· 2013-04-04· cited 14×
- Skinner v. UphoffD. Wyoming· 2002-08-02· cited 2×
- U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. BreerVermont Superior Court· 2016-05-17
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court· 1940-11-12· cited 1,544×
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 955×
- Esplin v. HirschiTenth Circuit· 1968-09-30· cited 393×
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 325×
- Alliance to End Repression v. James M. Rochford, Etc., American Civil Liberties Union v. Griffin B. BellSeventh Circuit· 1977-11-22· cited 155×
- Moscarelli v. StammE.D. New York· 1968-07-22· cited 134×
- The Black Panther Party v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1981-07-08· cited 106×
- DeBremaecker v. ShortFifth Circuit· 1970-11-03· cited 103×
- Marie Wilcox, Appellants-Plaintiffs v. Commerce Bank of Kansas City, a Corporation, Appellee-DefendantTenth Circuit· 1973-03-19· cited 101×
- Joseph D. Adashunas, a Minor by His Parents, Alvin and Olga Adashunas, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Harold H. NegleySeventh Circuit· 1980-09-22· cited 95×
- Kenney v. FoxSixth Circuit· 1956-04-19· cited 95×
- Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.Third Circuit· 1976-03-03· cited 93×
- Everett v. SchnecklothSupreme Court· 1956-10-08· cited 85×
- Ingenito v. Bermec CorporationS.D. New York· 1974-05-08· cited 81×
- Coye Peterson v. The Oklahoma City Housing Authority, a Public Corporation and State AgencyTenth Circuit· 1976-12-01· cited 78×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1980-07-15· cited 68×
- Little Redhouse, Brady Tah, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Quality Ford Sales, Inc., a Utah Corporation, and Thomas E. ReddTenth Circuit· 1975-02-03· cited 66×
- Vernon J. Rockler & Co. v. Graphic Enterprises, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1971-05-11· cited 63×
- Seiden v. NicholsonN.D. Illinois· 1976-01-30· cited 59×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.