Daien v. Ysursa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an individual’s past political activities and intent to circulate petitions in the future demonstrated “more than a passing fancy” and supported his claim of standing
• court found that Idaho statute requiring residency for petition circulators unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).