CITIZENS IN CHARGE v. Gale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing Nebraska’s residency requirement and concluding that Jaeger did not control and was distinguishable, noting that Jaeger specifically stated that there was “no evidence in the record” of the alleged burden associated with the ban
• upholding a provision similar to MCL 168.482(7)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).