Second Circuit· 8/14/2018
D'Addario v. D'Addario
Citations
- 901 F.3d 80
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring RICO plaintiffs to show \some direct relation between the injury asserted and the injurious conduct alleged\
- referring to a secondary source for the proposition that the Eighth Circuit has not addressed the question
- requiring RICO plaintiffs to show “some direct relation between the injury asserted and the injurious conduct alleged”
- “To successfully plead a RICO claim under § 1962(b), a plaintiff must indeed allege distinct damages arising from the acquisition or maintenance of control of the enterprise.”
- “[A]t this early pleading stage,” Virginia’s allegations also “suffice to support her claim that each defendant participated in the 12 operation or management of the Estate as enterprise, in violation of 1962(c).”
- “These expenses were incurred in an attempt to protect both the Estate and [plaintiff’s] share of that Estate, and, for purposes of our causation inquiry here, the two are reasonably treated as indivisible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch, Carney, Hellerstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- NRP Holdings LLC v. City of BuffaloSecond Circuit· 2019-02-20· cited 62×
- Doe v. Trump Corp.S.D. Illinois· 2019-07-24· cited 33×
- Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Russian Fed'nS.D. Illinois· 2019-07-30· cited 33×
- HCB Fin v. McPhersonFifth Circuit· 2021-08-04· cited 24×
- United States v. KellySecond Circuit· 2025-02-12· cited 9×
- D'Addario v. D'AddarioSecond Circuit· 2023-07-24· cited 8×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court· 2014-03-25· cited 2,704×
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 1,972×
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 1,166×
- Koch v. Christie's International PLCSecond Circuit· 2012-10-04· cited 967×
- In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2010-08-16· cited 871×
- Boyle v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-06-08· cited 823×
- Bankers Trust Company v. Daniel Rhoades, Herman Soifer and Milton BratenSecond Circuit· 1988-10-03· cited 425×
- First Capital Asset Management, Inc. v. Satinwood, Inc.Second Circuit· 2004-09-27· cited 387×
- Nynex Corp. v. Discon, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-12-14· cited 340×
- Crest Construction II, Inc. v. DoeEighth Circuit· 2011-10-31· cited 322×
- Cruz v. FXDirectDealer, LLCSecond Circuit· 2013-06-19· cited 281×
- First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp.Second Circuit· 1994-06-09· cited 272×
- American Psychiatric Ass'n v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc.Second Circuit· 2016-05-13· cited 246×
- Grimmett v. BrownNinth Circuit· 1996-01-26· cited 191×
- Discon, Incorporated v. Nynex Corporation, Nynex Material Enterprises, New York Telephone Company, Robert J. Eckenrode, and Bernard O'ReillySecond Circuit· 1996-08-26· cited 159×
- United States v. GomezSecond Circuit· 2017-12-05· cited 109×
- Stochastic Decisions, Inc. v. DiDomenicoSecond Circuit· 1993-06-04· cited 82×
- Isaac v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-04-23· cited 78×
- Gaynor v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-09-03· cited 67×
Other cases named D'Addario v. D'Addario
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.