S.D. New York· 7/24/2013

Dabney v. Christmas Tree Shops

Citations

958 F. Supp. 2d 439
2013 WL 3820668
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the plaintiff’s “replacement by a white employee [would be] enough to get her past the prima facie stage”
finding that plaintiff’s replacement by a white employer was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find that defendants’ nondiscriminatory reason was pretextual
analyzing discrimination claims under Title VII, the ADEA, and the NYSHRL together under the first step of the McDonnell Douglass burden-shifting framework, under which a plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of discrimination
analyzing discrimination claims under Title VII, the ADEA, and the NYSHRL together under the first step of the McDonnell Douglass burden-shifting framework, under which a plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of discrimination
granting summary judgment on Title VII and NYSHRL retaliation claims, despite temporal proximity between termination and protected activity, because “the termination was ultimately the product of an extensive period of progressive discipline” (quotation marks omitted)
applying the same framework to Title VIJ and the NYSHRL claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seibel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.