Skip to main content
· 9/16/2010

Cypress v. Com.

Citations

  • 699 S.E.2d 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the procedure established in former Code § 19.2-187.1 did not adequately safeguard a criminal defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause\
  • certificates of analysis admitted into evidence \establishing\ that the substances seized were illegal narcotics, and stating the weight of the samples, were \testimonial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cynthia D. Kinser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.