Sanders v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a laboratory report was non-testimonial because it was “created for medical treatment purposes”
• recognizing that medical examinations can serve a “dual purpose: (1) to gather forensic information to investigate and potentially prosecute a defendant for the alleged offenses and (2
• holding that medical reports created for treatment purposes are nontestimonial, despite circumstances objectively indicating the documents could be used for later criminal prosecution
• recognizing that medical examinations can serve a “dual purpose: (1) to gather forensic information to investigate and potentially prosecute a defendant for the alleged offenses and (2) to obtain information necessary for medical diagnosis and treatment of the victim”
• holding that a medical report prepared for treatment purposes is not testimonial
• determining that a laboratory report was non-testimonial because it was “created for medical treatment purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).