Curran v. Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognition that mandatory preclusion discussed in Kaminski v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co., 338 Pa.Super. 400, 487 A.2d 1340 (1985
• recognition that mandatory preclusion discussed in Kaminski v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co., 338 Pa.Super. 400, 487 A.2d 1340 (1985) had been abandoned in Feingold, and in its stead, the Supreme Court requires courts to balance the facts and circumstances of each case
• ten days’ notice of expert’s identity sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).