Skip to main content
· 12/18/2009

Astech International, LLC v. Husick

Citations

  • 676 F. Supp. 2d 389
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118414
  • 2009 WL 5103555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiff identified sufficient evidence to present a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendant's alleged legal malpractice caused the plaintiffs the actual loss of hiring additional counsel and incurring additional legal fees
  • “Pennsylvania courts have been very clear that plaintiffs in all malpractice actions must prove actual loss.”
  • “[O]ne of the important policies underlying the requirement of proving actual loss-and, in turn, the case-within-a-case methodology-is to prevent the plaintiff from obtaining a windfall judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.