· 12/18/2009
Astech International, LLC v. Husick
Citations
- 676 F. Supp. 2d 389
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118414
- 2009 WL 5103555
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the plaintiff identified sufficient evidence to present a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendant's alleged legal malpractice caused the plaintiffs the actual loss of hiring additional counsel and incurring additional legal fees
- “Pennsylvania courts have been very clear that plaintiffs in all malpractice actions must prove actual loss.”
- “[O]ne of the important policies underlying the requirement of proving actual loss-and, in turn, the case-within-a-case methodology-is to prevent the plaintiff from obtaining a windfall judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Neill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.