Emerick v. Carson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding argument that the expert's opinion was \flawed\ was a contention that \obviously goes to the weight to be accorded to [the] testimony ... and not to its admissibility\
• contention that testimony of expert is flawed goes only to weight jury should accord it and not to its admissibility
• blood drawn then sent to another hospital for test, test results incorporated into original hospital’s record which was then admitted into evidence
• where appellant contended that the failure to instruct the jury on the “discovered peril” doctrine had been reversible error, it was held that there had been no error because, in any event, the doctrine had no application to the facts
• petition for allowance of appeal denied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).