Davignon v. Hodgson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under Mt. Healthy, \the plaintiff must [first] show that the employer would not have taken adverse action but for the plaintiff's speech\
• reasoning that sheriff's \concerns about potential disruption\ did not \have substance\ because record evidence contradicted the concerns
• requiring employer to \engage in further investigation\ because he \had strong evidence indicating the plaintiffs' speech was not disruptive\ that he did not consider

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).