Federal Circuit· 9/30/2016
Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp.
Citations
- 838 F.3d 1307
- 120 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1353
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17695
- 2016 WL 5539870
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing a patent claim that featured generic processing equipment as non-inventive
- “The Supreme Court has held that ‘fundamental ... practiced] long prevalent’ are abstract ideas”
- “A narrow claim directed to an abstract idea . . . is not necessarily patent-eligible, for ‘[w]hile preemption may signal patent ineligible subject matter, the absence of complete preemption does not demonstrate patent eligibility.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dyk, Mayer, Stoll
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Federal Circuit· 2018-02-08· cited 512×
- SAP Am., Inc. v. InvestPic, LLCFederal Circuit· 2018-05-15· cited 276×
- Two-Way Media Ltd. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLCFederal Circuit· 2017-11-01· cited 236×
- Bsg Tech LLC v. Buyseasons, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2018-08-15· cited 229×
- Amdocs (Israel) Limited v. Openet Telecom, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2016-11-01· cited 192×
- Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2018-01-10· cited 154×
- Sri Int'l, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.Federal Circuit· 2019-03-20· cited 106×
- Tecsec, Inc. v. Adobe Inc.Federal Circuit· 2020-10-23· cited 93×
- Cardionet, LLC v. Infobionic, IncFederal Circuit· 2020-04-17· cited 89×
- Smart Systems Innovations, LLC v. Chicago Transit AuthorityFederal Circuit· 2017-10-18· cited 80×
- Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. Htc America, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2018-11-16· cited 70×
- Ericsson Inc. v. Tcl Communication TechnologyFederal Circuit· 2020-04-14· cited 58×
- Mobile Acuity Ltd. v. Blippar Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2024-08-06· cited 47×
- Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green Shades Software, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2018-05-31· cited 43×
- Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Federal Circuit· 2018-05-31· cited 36×
- Beteiro, LLC v. Draftkings Inc.Federal Circuit· 2024-06-21· cited 29×
- In Re: Marco Guldenaar Holding B.V.Federal Circuit· 2018-12-28· cited 24×
- Align Tech., Inc. v. 3shapeD. Delaware· 2018-09-07· cited 23×
- Broadband Itv, Inc. v. amazon.com, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2024-09-03· cited 23×
- Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceFederal Circuit· 2017-08-28· cited 20×
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1937-12-06· cited 2,059×
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 1,725×
- Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court· 1969-03-04· cited 1,203×
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 1,191×
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 1,180×
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 962×
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-05-22· cited 958×
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 915×
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court· 2006-04-26· cited 901×
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court· 2014-06-02· cited 763×
- Nicini v. MorraThird Circuit· 2000-05-19· cited 680×
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 669×
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationFederal Circuit· 2016-05-12· cited 648×
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.Supreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 599×
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court· 2010-06-28· cited 573×
- Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Federal Circuit· 2016-08-01· cited 524×
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court· 1981-03-03· cited 498×
- Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo BankFederal Circuit· 2014-12-23· cited 477×
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court· 1972-11-20· cited 442×
- BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLCFederal Circuit· 2016-06-27· cited 428×
Other cases named Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.