Skip to main content

Eck v. Eck

Citations

  • 475 A.2d 825
  • 327 Pa. Super. 334
  • 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court, in reversing a hearing master’s award of alimony, abused its discretion by considering facts and evidence not of record
  • holding that the trial court, in reversing a hearing master’s award of alimony, abused its discretion by considering facts and evidence not of record
  • noting that “a trial court may not consider facts or evidence dehors the record in making [any] determination.”
  • vacating judgment of sentence because the trial court “convicted McNeal of a crime with evidence that the Commonwealth never introduced at trial. This was patent error.”
  • wife’s voluntary decision to care for elderly, disabled mother and not to pursue education or training for employment did not preclude alimony award
  • lack of employment skills, lack of education, lack of experience, and age, among other factors, may constitute “compelling impediment[s] to gainful employment” for purposes of Section 501(c).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Cirillo, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.