Commonwealth Ex Rel. Maier v. Maier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where supporting spouse is sole stockholder of corporation and determines his own salary, court may pierce corporate veil and use corporate income as basis for determining earning capacity
• where supporting spouse is sole stockholder of corporation and determines his own salary, court may pierce corporate veil and use corporate income as basis for determining earning capacity
• where supporting spouse is sole stockholder of corporation and determines his own salary, court may pierce corporate veil and use corporate income as basis for determining earning capacity
• where supporting spouse is sole stockholder of corporation and determines his own salary, court may pierce corporate veil and use corporate income as basis for determining earning capacity
• where husband is sole owner of corporation and determines his own salary, the corporate veil will be pierced and corporate income will be considered in determining husband’s earning capacity
• because ex-husband is sole stockholder of two corporations and determines his own salary, case is appropriate for piercing corporate veil to consider income of corporations in determining ex-husband’s earning capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).