Skip to main content
· 12/10/1999

Crowley v. Apfel

Citations

  • 197 F.3d 194
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32211
  • 1999 WL 1062816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that use of the grid guidelines was appropriate where claimant was found only to suffer from exertional hmitations or where non-exer-tional hmitations do not significantly affect the claimant’s RFC
  • noting that once the ALJ identifies jobs within the claimant’s abilities, the burden shifts back to the claimant to rebut this finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Demoss, Benavides

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.