Sheila J. Young v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that substantial evidence in the record supporting a contrary outcome was not enough to warrant reversal
• concluding substantial evidence in the record supporting a contrary outcome was not enough to warrant reversal
• concluding substantial evidence in the record supporting a contrary outcome was not enough to warrant reversal
• noting that the Court “may not reverse the Commissioner’s decision merely because substantial evidence exists in the record that would have been supported a contrary outcome”
• finding it significant that no examining physician submitted medical conclusion that claimant is disabled or unable to work
• significant that no examining physician submitted medical conclusion that claimant is disabled or unable to work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).