Skip to main content
· 1/26/1998

Crary v. Djebelli

Citations

  • 496 S.E.2d 21
  • 329 S.C. 385
  • 1998 S.C. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The plaintiff need not allege or prove anything further in relation to the public interest requirement.”
  • \[Our supreme court] specifically declined . . . to hold that these are the only means for showing potential repetition and stated each case must be evaluated on its own merits.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Finney, Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.