· 1/26/1998
Crary v. Djebelli
Citations
- 496 S.E.2d 21
- 329 S.C. 385
- 1998 S.C. LEXIS 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The plaintiff need not allege or prove anything further in relation to the public interest requirement.”
- \[Our supreme court] specifically declined . . . to hold that these are the only means for showing potential repetition and stated each case must be evaluated on its own merits.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finney, Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.