Ninth Circuit· 7/28/2003
Coutee v. Barington Capital Group, L.P.
Citations
- 336 F.3d 1128
- 2003 WL 21730625
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, only when there are undisputed facts which are legally irreconcilable with the relief granted in the arbitration award, will the court find a manifest disregard of the law
- finding the court’s review of 5 an arbitration decision is “limited and highly deferential.”
- “A federal court may vacate an arbitration award, or a portion thereof, if the arbitrators acted beyond their authority.”
- “A federal court may vacate an arbitration award, or a portion thereof, if the arbitrators acted beyond their authority.”
- “A federal court may vacate an arbitration award, or a portion thereof, if the arbitrators acted beyond their authority.”
- When reviewing an arbitration award, “[the Court has] no authority 28 to re-weigh the evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Paez, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesNinth Circuit· 2009-01-29· cited 230×
- Michael E. Wallace, David Jacaruso and Joseph Scotti v. Daljit S. Buttar and Paramjit Buttar, Robert Winston, AdditionalSecond Circuit· 2004-08-05· cited 212×
- Lagstein v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS, LLOYD'S, LONDONNinth Circuit· 2010-06-10· cited 137×
- In Re Bosack v. SowardNinth Circuit· 2009-10-26· cited 122×
- Ventress v. Japan AirlinesNinth Circuit· 2010-04-30· cited 84×
- Biller v. Toyota Motor Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-03· cited 79×
- Sanford v. Memberworks, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-04-16· cited 66×
- Birmingham News Co. v. HornSupreme Court of Alabama· 2004-11-24· cited 55×
- New Regency Productions, Inc. v. Nippon Herald Films, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-09-04· cited 41×
- Houng v. Tatung Co.C.D. California· 2013-09-11· cited 13×
- Kenneth H. Hughes, Inc. v. Aloha Tower Development, Corp.D. Hawaii· 2009-09-09· cited 6×
- Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. AfridiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-12-21· cited 5×
- Pharmaniaga Berhad v. EHealthline.com, Inc.E.D. California· 2018-09-06· cited 5×
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesNinth Circuit· 2007-09-07· cited 4×
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesNinth Circuit· 2008-01-23· cited 3×
- Regional Local Union No. 846 v. Gulf Coast Rebar, Inc.D. Oregon· 2015-01-26· cited 3×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2007-04-16· cited 1×
- Barinaga v. CoxNinth Circuit· 2009-04-07· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2003-07-28
- New Regency Product v. Nippon Herald FilmsNinth Circuit· 2007-09-04
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 138×
- G.C. And K.B. Investments, Inc., a Louisiana Corporation v. Stuart Wilson Irene WilsonNinth Circuit· 2003-04-23· cited 115×
- Sheet Metal Workers' International Association Local Union No. 359 v. Madison Industries, Inc., of ArizonaNinth Circuit· 1996-05-29· cited 110×
- American Postal Workers Union Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service, San Francisco Bulk Mail Center, Richmond, CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1982-06-08· cited 93×
- Giblin v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals· 1988-11-29· cited 85×
- Milton BARNES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Martin LOGAN, Koren Logan, Trustees for the Logan Inter Vivos Trust, Respondents-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1997-08-20· cited 49×
- Don Buchwald & Associates, Inc. v. RichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-03-27· cited 31×
- First Interregional Equity Corp. v. HaughtonS.D. New York· 1994-01-24· cited 8×
- Pearlman v. Friedman Alpren & Green LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-12-24· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.