In Re Bosack v. Soward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that and arbitrator’s “award may be made without explanation of their reasons and without a complete record of their proceedings”
• explaining that arbitrators manifestly disregard the law if they recognize the applicable law but then ignore it
• stating that “ ‘[t]here must be some evidence in the record, other than the result, that the arbitrators were aware of the law and intentionally disregarded it’ ”
• observing that “it is all but impossible to determine whether [an arbitrator] acted with manifest disregard for the law” if he issues an award “without explanation of [his] reasons” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• reviewing courts do “not [determine] whether the 20 panel’s findings of fact are correct or internally consistent”
• adopting the rule that “an interim award may be deemed final for func- tus officio purposes if the award states it is final, and if the arbitrator intended the award to be final”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).