In Re Bosack v. Soward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that and arbitrator’s “award may be made without explanation of their reasons and without a complete record of their proceedings”
• explaining that arbitrators manifestly disregard the law if they recognize the applicable law but then ignore it
• stating that “ ‘[t]here must be some evidence in the record, other than the result, that the arbitrators were aware of the law and intentionally disregarded it’ ”
• observing that “it is all but impossible to determine whether [an arbitrator] acted with manifest disregard for the law” if he issues an award “without explanation of [his] reasons” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• reviewing courts do “not [determine] whether the 20 panel’s findings of fact are correct or internally consistent”
• adopting the rule that “an interim award may be deemed final for func- tus officio purposes if the award states it is final, and if the arbitrator intended the award to be final”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Lagstein v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS, LLOYD'S, LONDON
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-06-10· cited 137×
• Johnson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-02-15· cited 81×
• Biller v. Toyota Motor Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-03· cited 79×
• Aspic Engineering and Constr. v. Ecc Centcom Constructors LLC
  Ninth Circuit· 2019-01-28· cited 48×
• Carolyn Burton v. Class Counsel and Party to Arb
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-12-17· cited 26×
• Countrywide Financial Corp. v. Bundy
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-08-06· cited 18×
• Treadwell v. Village Homes of Colorado, Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-11-25· cited 18×
• International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 824 v. Verizon Florida, LLC
  Eleventh Circuit· 2015-10-07· cited 17×
• T3 Enters., Inc. v. Safeguard Bus. Sys., Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2019-02-21· cited 9×
• Ehm Productions, Inc. v. Starline Tours of Hollywood
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-06-24· cited 6×
• Stati v. Republic of Kaz.
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-03-23· cited 5×
• Mike Rose's Auto Body, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.
  N.D. California· 2019-06-17· cited 4×
• Swenson v. Bushman Investment Properties, Ltd.
  D. Idaho· 2012-04-27· cited 4×
• Regional Local Union No. 846 v. Gulf Coast Rebar, Inc.
  D. Oregon· 2015-01-26· cited 3×
• Aspic Engineering & Construction Co. v. ECC Centcom Constructors, LLC
  N.D. California· 2017-07-18· cited 2×
• Tutor Perini Bldg. Corp. v. S. Cal. Dist. Council of Laborers
  C.D. California· 2019-01-02· cited 2×
• Kaliroy Produce Co. v. Pacific Tomato Growers, Inc.
  D. Arizona· 2010-08-04· cited 1×
• Hill v. Wackenhut Services International
  District of Columbia· 2013-09-18· cited 1×
• State v. Nebraska Assn. of Pub. Employees
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2023-01-20· cited 1×
• Stati v. Republic of Kazakhstan
  District of Columbia· 2018-03-23

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 4,461×
• BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore
  Supreme Court· 1996-05-28· cited 2,781×
• State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Campbell
  Supreme Court· 2003-04-07· cited 2,318×
• Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,022×
• Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2008-03-25· cited 1,661×
• Wilko v. Swan
  Supreme Court· 1953-12-07· cited 1,363×
• Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West Associates
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-01-29· cited 230×
• Collins v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-09-24· cited 145×
• San Martine Compania De Navegacion, S.A. v. Saguenay Terminals Limited
  Ninth Circuit· 1961-08-02· cited 125×
• La Vale Plaza, Inc., a New York Corporation v. R. S. Noonan, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation
  Third Circuit· 1967-05-26· cited 121×
• Mark J. Hoffman v. Cargill Incorporated, National Grain and Feed Association, Movant. National Grain and Feed Association, Movant/amicus on Behalf Of
  Eighth Circuit· 2001-01-09· cited 118×
• Woodrow W. Dawahare v. Adam A. Spencer Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. Smith Barney, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 2000-04-27· cited 109×
• Gherman v. Colburn
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-08-10· cited 85×
• De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-12-21· cited 43×
• Coast Trading Co., Inc. v. Pacific Molasses Co., Etc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-07-22· cited 41×
• Coutee v. Barington Capital Group, L.P.
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-07-28· cited 41×
• Mcclatchy Newspapers v. Central Valley Typographical Union No. 46
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-07-14· cited 37×
• Legion Insurance Co. v. Vcw, Inc. Preferred Administrative Services, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-11-24· cited 35×
• Christopher C. McGrann v. First Albany Corporation
  First Circuit· 2005-09-14· cited 31×
• New Meiji Market v. United Food & Commercial Workers Local Union 905
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-05-22· cited 28×