Cotton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court’s findings of fact must be accorded a presumption of correctness so long as they are supported by the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rogers
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 290×
• Cole v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-20· cited 3×
• Lugo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-15· cited 2×
• Salazar v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-23
• J.X. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-13

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Oregon v. Mathiason
  Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
• California v. Beheler
  Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
• Connor v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-09-06· cited 331×
• Fitzpatrick v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-21· cited 155×
• Roman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 105×
• Correll v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-14· cited 104×
• Nelson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-07-10· cited 69×
• Cillo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-07· cited 22×
• State v. Taylor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-24· cited 17×
• State v. Clark
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-02· cited 15×
• State v. Gonzalez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-30· cited 14×
• Duddles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-25· cited 14×
• State v. Gelin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-19· cited 8×
• State v. Cornuz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-22· cited 4×