Skip to main content

Cotton v. State

Citations

  • 613 S.E.2d 628
  • 279 Ga. 358
  • 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1570
  • 2005 Ga. LEXIS 374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a pro se motion for new trial while represented was “unauthorized and without effect”
  • no error in failing to excuse jury panel where trial court inquired whether errant remark had affected remaining jurors’ impartiality
  • “Since he was represented by new appellate counsel at the time he filed this pro se motion, however, it was unauthorized and without effect.” (emphasis added)
  • no error in failing to excuse jury panel where trial court inquired whether errant remark had affected remaining jurors’ impartiality
  • “because of the jurors’ difficulty in distinguishing between felony murder and voluntary manslaughter, providing them with written instructions was particularly appropriate”
  • “because of the jurors’ difficulty in distinguishing between felony murder and voluntary manslaughter, providing them with written instructions was particularly appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.