Cotto v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate courts defer to the circuit court’s factual findings that are supported by competent, substantial evidence in reviewing an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
• “[W]e read Hale to forbid only the imposition of two or more consecutive sentences that have themselves been enhanced and which arise from the same criminal episode.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Damion Hayes v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
  Eleventh Circuit· 2021-08-25· cited 53×
• Josue Cotto v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-05-15· cited 23×
• Saldana v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-09· cited 7×
• Knight v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-03-11· cited 1×
• State v. Jean-Guilles
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-30

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Hale v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 430×
• Sochor v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-07-08· cited 228×
• Daniels v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-02-20· cited 102×
• Bolin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-07-01· cited 82×
• Krawczuk v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-04-12· cited 26×
• Bedford v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-03-10· cited 22×
• Fuller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-06· cited 16×
• Reeves v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-10· cited 14×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-17· cited 3×
• Cotto v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-16· cited 2×