Skip to main content

Bedford v. State

Citations

  • 633 So. 2d 13
  • 1994 WL 70097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding all writs jurisdiction to consider a challenge to a kidnapping sentence because “[w]e previously had jurisdiction of Bedford’s kidnapping sentence in conjunction with his appeal from a conviction of first- degree murder and a sentence of death”
  • prior reversal on review of death penalty in which kidnapping sentence was affirmed without any challenge to illegality did not bar defendant from challenging illegality of kidnapping sentence by motion in trial court under rule 3.800(a)
  • \[I]t cannot be used as an independent basis of jurisdiction.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.