Fuller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under Hale, a non-habitual offender sentence cannot run consecutively to an habitual offender sentence that exceeded the statutory maximum for the degree of felony subject to enhanced sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reeves v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-05-17· cited 44×
• Reeves v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-10· cited 14×
• Kiedrowski v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-29· cited 13×
• Mills v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-30· cited 8×
• Jeremiah T. Pinkard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-22· cited 7×
• Dawson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-28· cited 6×
• Hamilton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-24· cited 6×
• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-06· cited 6×
• Elliott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-03· cited 5×
• Cotto v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-30· cited 5×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-17· cited 3×
• Powell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-27· cited 3×
• State v. Fuller
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-10-21· cited 2×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-18· cited 2×
• Peel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-02· cited 1×
• Evans v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-06

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hale v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 430×
• Canavan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-17· cited 5×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-10· cited 5×