Skip to main content
· 5/7/1993

Schibursky v. International Business MacHines Corp.

Citations

  • 820 F. Supp. 1169
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6411
  • 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,965
  • 61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1520
  • 1993 WL 152900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs subjective beliefs and bare allegations fell far short of demonstrating that age was a determining factor in her discharge
  • requiring that the complaint “identify which defendants made false and defamatory statements”
  • on motion for summary judgment, refusing to consider documents consisting of handwritten notations, the source and date of which were not indicated, and which were not accompanied by affidavit or evidence authenticating them
  • same as to statements that employee was “hard to work with!’ and “rude”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.