Kelly v. Chase Manhattan Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this claim was time barred
• “In New York [promissory estoppel] is reserved for a limited class of cases based on unusual circumstances”
• “recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress ‘is circumscribed to unique facts where a special duty is owed.’ ”
• plaintiff could not invoke protection of Weiner based upon “abstract assurances of future employment”
• “Even under the most optimal circumstances, however, termination of an employee is likely to give rise to bad feelings and anxiety. This cannot mean that every adverse employment decision may give rise to a claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress.”
• “Even under the most optimal circumstances, however, termination of an employee is likely to give rise to bad feelings and anxiety. This cannot mean that every adverse employment decision may give rise to a claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).