Skip to main content
· 11/10/1987

Aberman v. Malden Mills Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 414 N.W.2d 769
  • 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1430
  • 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that employer’s promise that “I will always take care of you, you will always be with Malden” was insufficient to establish permanent-employment contract
  • concluding that the 28 statement \we are offering you security\ only indicated an at- will employment relationship
  • explaining that an at-will employee is not entitled to a specific commission rate
  • explaining that an at-will employee is not entitled to a specific commission rate
  • holding \general statements of company policy are not definite enough\
  • “employee must show some unusual consideration so the court has better reason to believe this was no ordinary at-will contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forsberg, Wozniak, Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.