· 11/10/1987
Aberman v. Malden Mills Industries, Inc.
Citations
- 414 N.W.2d 769
- 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1430
- 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4992
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that employer’s promise that “I will always take care of you, you will always be with Malden” was insufficient to establish permanent-employment contract
- concluding that the 28 statement \we are offering you security\ only indicated an at- will employment relationship
- explaining that an at-will employee is not entitled to a specific commission rate
- explaining that an at-will employee is not entitled to a specific commission rate
- holding \general statements of company policy are not definite enough\
- “employee must show some unusual consideration so the court has better reason to believe this was no ordinary at-will contract.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forsberg, Wozniak, Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.