Copp v. Paxton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment because defendant's statements about plaintiff's lack of qualifications were not false
• “In making the distinction [between fact and opinion], the courts have regarded as opinion any broad, unfocused and wholly subjective comment.”
• “In making the distinction [between fact and opinion], the courts have regarded as opinion any broad, unfocused and wholly subjective comment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).