District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/28/2018
Cooks v. State
Citations
- 249 So. 3d 774
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Grand theft (both second and third degrees) and petit theft (both first and second degrees) are necessarily 15 lesser included offenses of scheme to defraud.”
- “If, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, sufficient evidence exists to sustain a conviction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bilbrey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
- Pizzo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-21· cited 112×
- Donovan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-21· cited 30×
- Sewall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-20· cited 15×
- Pizzo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-22· cited 11×
- Beamon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-02· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.