District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 7/24/1992
Cooke v. Griffiths-Garcia Corp.
Citations
- 612 A.2d 1251
- 1992 D.C. App. LEXIS 183
- 1992 WL 173328
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a defendant’s reliance on an attorney’s incorrect representations regarding a contract were not reasonable based on facts within the defendant’s knowledge
- “Summary judgment is inappropriate where questions of intent are at issue.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Ferren, Kern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Patton Boggs, LLP v. Chevron CorporationD.C. Circuit· 2012-06-22· cited 116×
- Murray v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-07-17· cited 100×
- Edmondson & Gallagher v. Alban Towers Tenants Ass'nD.C. Circuit· 1995-03-10· cited 90×
- NCRIC, Inc. v. Columbia Hospital for Women Medical Center, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-10-02· cited 46×
- Musa v. Continental Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-07-14· cited 29×
- Dyer v. William S. Bergman & Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-04-20· cited 27×
- Burnett v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict of Columbia· 2015-04-22· cited 22×
- Robinson v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-25· cited 18×
- Bannum, Inc. v. Citizens for a Safe Ward Five, Inc.District of Columbia· 2005-08-10· cited 15×
- Minebea Co., Ltd. v. PapstDistrict of Columbia· 1998-06-22· cited 13×
- Slinski v. Bank of America, N.A.District of Columbia· 2013-09-30· cited 13×
- Terrell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-29· cited 11×
- Unnamed caseD.C. Circuit· 1995-03-10· cited 10×
- Mattiaccio v. Dha Group, Inc.District of Columbia· 2014-02-26· cited 10×
- Needle v. HoyteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-07-25· cited 7×
- Naegele v. AlbersDistrict of Columbia· 2015-06-23· cited 4×
- Terrell v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-29
- Elghannam v. National Association of Boards of PharmacyDistrict of Columbia· 2016-07-15
- Legal Technology Group, Inc. v. MukerjiDistrict of Columbia· 2019-06-10
- Trilogy Federal, LLC v. Civitasdx LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2025-02-09
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-20· cited 225×
- Subin v. GoldsmithSecond Circuit· 1955-06-03· cited 128×
- Alfred A. Altimont, Inc. v. Chatelain, Samperton & NolanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-05-05· cited 82×
- Williams v. GerstenfeldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-09-10· cited 67×
- Swann v. WaldmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-08-26· cited 24×
- Deoudes v. GB MacKe CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1959-07-07· cited 17×
- White v. LuberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1958-09-19· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.