Burnett v. American Federation of Government Employees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, 4 under the same standard, that the plaintiff stated a claim based on the defendant’s “pattern 5 of racist and discriminatory comments”
• dismissing section 1981 claim with prejudice where plaintiff who worked for a third-party company “concede[d] that because AFGE’s contract was with [a third-party]—not with him personally—he d[id] not have cognizable Section 1981 claims” against AFGE

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).