NCRIC, Inc. v. Columbia Hospital for Women Medical Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We have never declared it an element of a prima facie case that the defendant's intentional interference be otherwise wrongful.”
• “We have never declared it an element of a prima facie case that the defendant's intentional interference be otherwise wrongful.”
• “We have never declared it an element of a prima facie case that the defendant’s intentional interference be otherwise wrongful.”
• “Wrongful conduct is not an element of a prima facie case of tortious interference under District of Columbia law.”
• “Instead of the plaintiff bearing the burden of proving that the defendant’s conduct was wrongful, it is the defendant who bears the burden of proving that it was not.”
• “The failure to assert a particular sufficiency challenge in a Rule 50(a) motion precludes consideration of that challenged on appeal. . . . [N]ew grounds may not be asserted in the post-verdict motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).