Patton Boggs, LLP v. Chevron Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a complaint because it was unclear “who breached what obligation and how, and the manner in which the defendants intentionally caused that breach”
• dismissing a complaint because it was unclear “who breached what obligation and how, and the manner in which the defendant[] intentionally caused that breach”
• dismissing a complaint because it was unclear “who breached what obligation and how, and the manner in which the defendants intentionally caused that breach”
• dismissing a complaint because it was unclear “who breached what obligation and how, and the manner in which the defendants intentionally caused that breach”
• “Rule 59(e) is not a vehicle to present a new legal theory that was available prior to judgment.”
• “Rule 59(e) is not a vehicle to present a new legal theory that was available prior to judgment . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).