Skip to main content

Cook v. State

Citations

  • 7 P.3d 53
  • 2000 Wyo. LEXIS 139
  • 2000 WL 712871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • W.R.E. 801(d)(1)(B) does not prohibit admission of post-motive consistent statements for the purpose of evaluating the credibility of the declarant who testifies at trial. “Without a rule violation, [the appellant] cannot satisfy the second prong of our test for plain error[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lehman, Thomas, MacY, Golden, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.