Wyoming Supreme Court· 7/2/1998
Vaughn v. State
Citations
- 962 P.2d 149
- 1998 Wyo. LEXIS 97
- 1998 WL 350502
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing judicial discretion includes conclusions drawn from objective criteria
- because standard of proof differs, court may revoke probation even though defendant acquitted in criminal proceeding based on same act violating probation
- court may revoke probation even though defendant acquitted in criminal proceeding based on same act
- court may revoke probation even though defendant acquitted in criminal proceeding based on same act
- court may revoke probation even though defendant acquitted in criminal proceeding based on same act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lehman, Thomas, MacY, Golden, Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
205 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. InkelaarCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-08-17· cited 136×
- Brown v. UphoffTenth Circuit· 2004-09-08· cited 95×
- Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-02-19· cited 85×
- Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2002-07-03· cited 85×
- Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2002-05-14· cited 69×
- Pace v. PaceWyoming Supreme Court· 2001-05-03· cited 63×
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-22· cited 63×
- Ryan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1999-10-08· cited 51×
- State v. EbronSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-28· cited 49×
- Allen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2002-04-02· cited 49×
- Carlton v. CarltonWyoming Supreme Court· 2000-03-01· cited 48×
- Northern Arapaho Tribe v. HarnsbergerTenth Circuit· 2012-10-18· cited 47×
- Belden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-07-31· cited 46×
- Redland v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court· 2012-11-21· cited 42×
- Trujillo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 41×
- Griswold v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2001-02-12· cited 41×
- Watt v. WattWyoming Supreme Court· 1999-01-19· cited 39×
- Winsted v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2010-10-26· cited 39×
- Dewey v. WentlandWyoming Supreme Court· 2002-01-10· cited 38×
- Hampton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2006-08-23· cited 38×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-06-18· cited 256×
- Byerly v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-15· cited 107×
- Jahnke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1984-06-06· cited 105×
- Love v. LoveWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-05-07· cited 59×
- In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 51×
- Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1995-10-06· cited 51×
- Nowotny v. L & B Contract Industries, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1997-03-07· cited 44×
- Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1997-09-19· cited 43×
- Ketcham v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1980-11-10· cited 42×
- Triggs v. TriggsWyoming Supreme Court· 1996-06-28· cited 39×
- Williams v. StaffordWyoming Supreme Court· 1979-01-11· cited 39×
- Vit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1996-01-05· cited 34×
- Scherer v. SchererWyoming Supreme Court· 1997-01-31· cited 30×
- Coulthard v. CossairtWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 29×
- Gaines v. DobyWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-07-06· cited 29×
- Minchew v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1984-08-06· cited 27×
- Eager v. DerowitschWyoming Supreme Court· 1951-06-19· cited 26×
- Mapp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1996-12-17· cited 24×
- Robinson v. HamblinWyoming Supreme Court· 1996-04-01· cited 22×
- Kupec v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-07-31· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.