Supreme Court of Colorado· 7/9/1990
People v. Davis
Citations
- 794 P.2d 159
- 1990 WL 61639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Witt standard regarding the exclusion of jurors because of their views on the death penalty is the governing standard in Colorado
- stating that this court will not automatically assume that, in the absence of a necessary limiting instruction, the jury correctly applied a statutory aggravating factor
- recognizing a common law right to waive trial by jury in class 1 felony cases
- recognizing a common law right to waive trial by jury in class 1 felony cases
- noting that focus on the purpose of the murder narrows the class of murders for which the aggravating circumstance applies
- holding that the submission to the jury of both a felony murder aggravator under section 16 — 11—103(5)(g) and a kidnapping aggra-vator under section 16-ll-103(5)(d) was proper despite the fact that the felony of kidnapping was the basis of both factors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirshbaum, Lohr, Mullarkey, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-04-15· cited 1,618×
- People v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-06-06· cited 1,592×
- Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2007-05-14· cited 1,343×
- People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado· 2001-06-25· cited 840×
- State v. HallTennessee Supreme Court· 1998-09-21· cited 732×
- People v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-06-10· cited 710×
- People v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-02-24· cited 544×
- State v. DiFriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-07-27· cited 455×
- People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-07-30· cited 410×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-10· cited 352×
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
- Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-10-04· cited 315×
- Auman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-03-28· cited 299×
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-02-14· cited 276×
- People v. LefebreSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-06-19· cited 243×
- Staley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-27· cited 194×
- People v. HowardIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-12-19· cited 186×
- Wheatfall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-06-29· cited 175×
- People v. DunlapSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-03-08· cited 165×
- State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-12-28· cited 144×
Cites
161 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 2,827×
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 2,410×
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,349×
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court· 1987-06-08· cited 2,038×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-04-23· cited 1,983×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.