Skip to main content

Contreras v. State

Citations

  • 718 P.2d 129
  • 1986 Alas. LEXIS 320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting case-by-case approach because it “is time consuming, creates a risk of non-uniform results and requires judges to become hypnosis experts in order to make intelligent determinations”
  • establishing the importance of distinguishing between the reliability and the corroboration of hearsay statements
  • witness may testify as to facts related before hypnosis as long as such information is adequately preserved
  • outlining the history of this case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.