Alaska Supreme Court· 4/18/1986
Contreras v. State
Citations
- 718 P.2d 129
- 1986 Alas. LEXIS 320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting case-by-case approach because it “is time consuming, creates a risk of non-uniform results and requires judges to become hypnosis experts in order to make intelligent determinations”
- establishing the importance of distinguishing between the reliability and the corroboration of hearsay statements
- witness may testify as to facts related before hypnosis as long as such information is adequately preserved
- outlining the history of this case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 376×
- People v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-04-02· cited 149×
- State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-03-05· cited 132×
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-25· cited 108×
- United States v. Brett C. KimberlinSeventh Circuit· 1987-01-09· cited 107×
- Thorne v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-05-26· cited 90×
- People v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-11-09· cited 84×
- State v. TuttleUtah Supreme Court· 1989-04-12· cited 79×
- Zani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-09-27· cited 72×
- People v. ZayasIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 72×
- People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-12-28· cited 58×
- Roark v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2002-09-26· cited 51×
- Young v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2016-06-17· cited 43×
- State v. MedranoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-02-04· cited 41×
- Harmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1995-12-22· cited 38×
- Ballard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-04-03· cited 38×
- Nitz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-06-06· cited 34×
- Haakanson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-08-05· cited 31×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-01-22· cited 31×
Cites
52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-03-11· cited 314×
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-14· cited 277×
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-05-16· cited 207×
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-05-04· cited 181×
- United States v. Moreno L. Keplinger, Paul L. Wright, and James B. PlankSeventh Circuit· 1985-10-29· cited 178×
- People v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals· 1983-07-05· cited 170×
- United States v. NarcisoE.D. Michigan· 1977-12-19· cited 167×
- Robison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1984-04-02· cited 155×
- United States v. Isiah Williams and Michael ManningSecond Circuit· 1978-09-20· cited 141×
- Commonwealth v. NazarovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-29· cited 141×
- State v. MenaArizona Supreme Court· 1981-02-03· cited 122×
- House v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-01-25· cited 121×
- Pulakis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1970-11-09· cited 111×
- Commonwealth v. KaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-03-23· cited 100×
- Vivian Sprynczynatyk and Paul Sprynczynatyk, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1985-09-17· cited 97×
- Hawley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-07-25· cited 97×
- Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1982-01-14· cited 96×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.