· 3/11/1991
Conroy v. Boston Edison Co.
Citations
- 758 F. Supp. 54
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3023
- 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 739
- 1991 WL 34804
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In deciding what a reasonable investigation would uncover the fact that a particular type of discrimination was actually investigated has evidentiary value.”
- untimely amend- ment alleging age discrimination does not relate back to original sex discrimination charge since not flowing from it
- court found allegations of new acts of discrimination were inappropriate where complainant failed to allege these acts in MCAD complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caffrey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.