Skip to main content
· 3/11/1991

Conroy v. Boston Edison Co.

Citations

  • 758 F. Supp. 54
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3023
  • 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 739
  • 1991 WL 34804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In deciding what a reasonable investigation would uncover the fact that a particular type of discrimination was actually investigated has evidentiary value.”
  • untimely amend- ment alleging age discrimination does not relate back to original sex discrimination charge since not flowing from it
  • court found allegations of new acts of discrimination were inappropriate where complainant failed to allege these acts in MCAD complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Caffrey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.