Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Second Circuit· 9/30/2003

Connecticut ex rel. Blumenthal v. Crotty

Citations

  • 346 F.3d 84
  • 2003 WL 22233555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “commercial lobstering” falls within the purview of the Privileges and Immunities Clause
  • holding that “commercial lob-stering” falls within the purview of the Privileges and Immunities Clause
  • holding that “commercial lobstering” falls within the purview of the Privileges and Immunities Clause
  • noting that “the right to pursue a lawful calling has long been recognized as a fundamental right” and citing Allgeyer
  • explaining that States may not “treat Residents and nonresidents disparately in connection with the pursuit of commerce, a trade, or business venture where that disparate treatment is not supported by a sufficient justification”
  • stating that the enforcement of a presumptively valid statute creates a heavy presumption in favor of qualified immunity and holding that the State of Connecticut was entitled to qualified immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, Sotomayor, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Connecticut ex rel. Blumenthal v. Crotty

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.