New Energy Co. of Indiana v. Limbach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Ohio law which denied favorable tax treatment to out-of-state ethanol producers unless their states of origin afforded similar treatment to Ohio producers discriminated against interstate commerce
• holding that Ohio law which denied favorable tax treatment to out-of-state ethanol producers unless their states of origin afforded similar treatment to Ohio producers discriminated against interstate commerce
• noting that \[d]irect subsidization of domestic industry does not ordinarily run afoul\ of the Commerce Clause
• noting that “[d]irect subsidization of domestic industry does not ordinarily run afoul” of the Commerce Clause
• stating that the negative Commerce Clause “prohibits economic protectionism— that is, regulatory measures designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors”
• explaining that the “ ‘negative’ aspect of the Commerce Clause prohibits economic protectionism—that is, regulatory measures designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).