Radolf v. University of Connecticut

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an internal investigation into plaintiffs possible fraud that cleared plaintiff of any wrongdoing, without allegations of attendant material disadvantage in employment terms, could not support a First Amendment retaliation claim
• “[B]ecause [plaintiff]’s claim centers around his contention that he was the ‘author’ or originator of the ideas and concepts that underlie the [disputed work], his Lanham Act claim necessarily fails in light of Dastar.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).