Skip to main content

Condore v. Prince George's County

Citations

  • 425 A.2d 1011
  • 289 Md. 516
  • 1981 Md. LEXIS 187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the common law doctrine of necessaries, which obligated the husband, but not the wife, to pay for his spouse’s necessaries, violated the E.R.A.
  • holding that the common law doctrine of necessaries, which obligated the husband, but not the wife, to pay for his spouse's necessaries, violated the E.R.A.
  • determining that the aspect of the common law of necessaries obligating a husband to provide for the wife's necessities, regardless of the income of the parties, unconstitutionally burdened an entire class of citizens based on sex
  • determining that the aspect of the common law of necessaries obligating a husband to provide for the wife’s necessities, regardless of the income of the parties, unconstitutionally burdened an entire class of citizens based on sex
  • discussing the effect of the ERA on various doctrines, and the responses of the courts and Legislature
  • discussing the effect of the ERA on various doctrines, and the responses of the courts and Legislature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.