Kline v. Ansell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a common law rule that only men could sue or be sued for criminal conversation violated the E.R.A.
• holding that a common law rule that only men could sue or be sued for criminal conversation violated the E.R.A.
• holding unconstitutional the cause of action of criminal conversation [24] that, at common law, was available only to a man
• holding unconstitutional the cause of action of criminal conversation 24 that, at common law, was available only to a man
• \explicating this Court's holding that it would be unconstitutional to impose a burden on fathers which was not equally imposed on mothers\
• \The common law cause of action for criminal conversation . . . cannot be reconciled with our commitment to equality of the sexes.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).